Acute promyelocytic leukaemia: reviewing outcomes of induction treatment with arsenic trioxide and retinoic acid
Intended for healthcare professionals
Evidence and practice    

Acute promyelocytic leukaemia: reviewing outcomes of induction treatment with arsenic trioxide and retinoic acid

Lauren Sheldon Student, doctor of nursing practice and adult-gerontology acute care nurse practitioner, School of Arts and Sciences, St. John Fisher College, Pittsford, New York, US

Why you should read this article:
  • To enhance your understanding of disease processes and treatment regimens in acute promyelocytic leukaemia

  • To recognise the risk of potentially life-threatening complications in acute promyelocytic leukaemia

  • To explore the evidence regarding two non-chemotherapy agents for treating acute promyelocytic leukaemia

Acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL) is a rare subtype of acute myeloid leukaemia with high mortality rates. Chemotherapy-based regimens have demonstrated effectiveness in achieving remission in APL, but they are associated with toxicities and adverse effects that often compromise patient outcomes and quality of life. In recent years two non-chemotherapy agents – arsenic trioxide (ATO) and retinoic acid, also called all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) – have been investigated for the treatment of APL.

This article discusses the findings of a literature review comparing regimens combining ATO and ATRA (ATO-ATRA) with ATRA plus chemotherapy regimens for induction treatment in patients newly diagnosed with APL. ATO-ATRA appeared to produce better results overall than standard chemotherapy-based regimens and it has a better side effect profile. ATO-ATRA could become the induction treatment of choice for low-risk to intermediate-risk patients with APL, although more research is needed. High-risk patients normally receive chemotherapy because of the need to rapidly decrease their white blood cell count, but there is emerging evidence that ATO-ATRA without chemotherapy could also be an option in high-risk patients.

Cancer Nursing Practice. doi: 10.7748/cnp.2022.e1780

Peer review

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and checked for plagiarism using automated software

Correspondence

lns07038@sjfc.edu

Conflict of interest

None declared

Sheldon L (2022) Acute promyelocytic leukaemia: reviewing outcomes of induction treatment with arsenic trioxide and retinoic acid. Cancer Nursing Practice. doi: 10.7748/cnp.2022.e1780

Published online: 07 February 2022

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more