Strategies for balancing internal and external validity in evaluations of interventions
Intended for healthcare professionals
Evidence and practice    

Strategies for balancing internal and external validity in evaluations of interventions

Suzanne Fredericks Professor, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada
Souraya Sidani Professor, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada
Mary Fox Associate professor, York University, Toronto, Canada
Joyal Miranda Associate professor, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada

Background Evaluations of interventions should be carefully designed and conducted to maintain a balance between internal and external validity, with the dual goal of minimising the influence of potential confounders and improving the generalisability or applicability of any findings to practice.

Aim To review strategies to promote balance between internal and external validity in an evaluation of a cognitive-behavioural intervention for chronic insomnia.

Discussion A pragmatic approach is needed to balance internal and external validity, and generate evidence relevant to practice. The authors present strategies to promote such a balance, including using strict eligibility criteria, subgroup analysis, random assignment of patients based on preferences, a no-treatment control condition, and standardised and consistent implementation of the intervention.

Conclusion A balance between internal and external validity is essential to promote enrolment in the study and confidence in attributing its outcomes to an intervention, as well as to provide answers to clinically relevant questions such as who benefits most from which intervention.

Implications for practice The authors recommend researchers conduct a pilot study in advance of an evaluation, to help decide which strategies to use and how to balance internal and external validity.

Nurse Researcher. doi: 10.7748/nr.2019.e1646

Peer review

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and has been checked for plagiarism using automated software

Correspondence

sfrederi@ryerson.ca

Conflict of interest

None declared

Fredericks S, Sidani S, Fox M et al (2019) Strategies for balancing internal and external validity in evaluations of interventions. Nurse Researcher. doi: 10.7748/nr.2019.e1646

Published online: 03 October 2019

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more