The experiences of older people who live with a long-term condition
Jaqui Hewitt-Taylor Senior lecturer, Pactice development at School of Health and Social Care, Bournemouth University
Carol Bond Head, Practice simulation at School of Health and Social Care, Bournemouth University
Sarah Hean Associate professor, School of Health and Social Care, Bournemouth University
Sue Barker Senior lecturer, School of Health and Social Care, Bournemouth University
Jaqui Hewitt-Taylor and colleagues explore the challenges faced by this group of patients and the nurses who care for them
Aim The aim of this study was to gain insight into the experiences of people aged 65 and older who have learned to live with a pre-existing long-term condition.
Method A qualitative approach and the principles of narrative research were used to learn as much as possible about the individuals’ stories. A focus group of five men was interviewed and two women were interviewed as a pair.
Findings Existing skills in condition management and interactions with professionals are transferable to new health needs that older people develop, but additional, age-related problems can affect management of long-term conditions. Progressive long-term conditions may become more difficult to manage with age, and it is difficult to distinguish between ageing processes and deterioration of pre-existing long-term conditions. Age-related social and financial changes and society’s perception of older people may also present challenges to condition management.
Conclusion Nurses who care for older people should take into account the effects of the person’s long-term condition and the ageing process when assessing their needs; understand that people may be reluctant to ask for practical assistance; explore existing support mechanisms that people have in place and their sustainability; and advocate with people to secure appropriate choices related to their health needs.
Nursing Older People.
25, 6, 21-25.
doi: 10.7748/nop2013.07.25.6.21.e425
Peer review
This article has been subject to double blind peer review
Conflict of interest
None declared
Received: 27 November 2012
Accepted: 26 February 2013
Want to read more?
Already have access? Log in
or
3-month trial offer for £5.25/month
Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
- Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
- RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
- NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
- Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
- A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe
Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days.
Buy now
Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more