Nursing students’ experiences of delivering dementia friends sessions to peers
Intended for healthcare professionals
Evidence and practice    

Nursing students’ experiences of delivering dementia friends sessions to peers

Linda Bale Nurse lecturer, University of Worcester, England
Catharine Jenkins Senior lecturer, Birmingham City University, England

Background Nursing students and registered nurses often feel underprepared for their roles in dementia care. Extracurricular activities offer nursing students additional opportunities for professional development. A student-academic partnership initiative was developed in which nursing students delivered dementia friends sessions to their peers before formal taught content.

Aim To explore dementia champion nursing students’ experiences, identify factors that affect collaborative working and make recommendations for future student-academic partnership projects.

Method In individual and dual interviews, three students were asked about their experiences of participating in the initiative. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using a thematic analysis framework.

Findings Four themes were identified: commitment to working with people who have dementia, difficulties in taking on extracurricular responsibilities, personal development, and relationships and collaboration.

Conclusion Students were motivated by the need to provide high-quality dementia care. They identified benefits of collaborative working including development of time management, team working, leadership, communication and presentation skills. Future projects should take into account student workloads and offer rewards that are congruent with nursing students’ values.

Nursing Older People. doi: 10.7748/nop.2018.e1046

Citation

Bale L, Jenkins C (2018) Nursing students’ experiences of delivering dementia friends sessions to peers. Nursing Older People. doi: 10.7748/nop.2018.e1046

Peer review

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and has been checked for plagiarism using automated software

Correspondence

catharine.jenkins@bcu.ac.uk

Conflict of interest

The study was funded by Birmingham City University, England

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Alex Centurion-Eyre, Naomi Fleming, Sibongile Mubonderi, Sarahjane Jones and Jonathan Gadsby

Published online: 16 August 2018

Your organisation does not have access to this article
Recommend to your librarian
RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

OR

3-month trial offer for �5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more